Pondering Hijab
Hijab really just means to cover or screen in Arabic, so it refers to modesty by any definition, though in the West is often used to refer to the headscarf worn by some Muslim women. I'm still trying to get a hold of the modesty situation here in Zanzibar, which is about 97% Muslim. Of course modesty is most evident in women's dress, though men here generally don't show their knees or shoulders. There is a male equivalent for the headscarf and other robes: many men wear the kufi (a small cap), and a few wear a long, traditional white robe, especially on Friday (the Muslim day of prayer). However, this seems to be largely optional, though most men wear traditional clothing to pray at the mosque (from what I've seen and heard, women simply aren't allowed into the mosques here in Zanzibar...). The dress code is much stricter for women, of course, and I'm not a fan of the double standard.
Just about all women and girls cover their heads, but uncovered forearms and half calves (especially while sitting down) seem to be acceptable. Moreover, young girls will often wear a headscarf, but have a knee-length skirt and completely bare arms under their veil. Also, many girls run around with their dresses undone in the back (I don't know whether it's because the clasp is broken because the dress has been worn by so many different girls, or because it's more comfortable). The headscarf is part of the school uniform for girls starting in preschool (and the kufi and white robe is the uniform at some schools for boys, which is REALLY cute on a four-year-old). Outside of school, girls up to the age of ten or so sometimes play in the streets without their heads covered.
Especially in rural areas, most Zanzibari women wear colourful kangas over their heads and wrapped around their waist over a skirt. Perhaps the strangest site I've seen with regards to hijab was a woman with her head covered and wearing the jilbab (a long, black, sort of jacket worn over the clothing in public by some women - the woman pictured in the Wiki picture I've linked to is in Stone Town!). Meanwhile, her daughter, perhaps four years old, was wearing a tiny mini skirt and a halter top, which I think is inappropriate for a child that age.
Perhaps 10% of women cover their faces with a niqab while in the street, though many will uncover their faces when in a restaurant, at work, outside on their doorstep at home, or in a dala dala, even if men are present. Male presence doesn't seem to be the determining factor for how much women cover, it seems to be more of a public-private thing. This reminds me of the traditional casa-calle (house-street) divide in Latin America, relegating women to the private sphere (casa), and largely keeping them out of the public sphere (calle - though this has changed significantly in many parts of Latin America).
Because Stone Town is so culturally diverse, people are quite tolerant with regards to dress. Indian women wear traditional saris, which sometimes bear the midriff, and they don't cover their heads. African Christian women dress just like they do in Dar es Salaam: usually knee-length to long pants or skirts, and tops that range in modesty from blouses to halter tops. The Maasai wear their traditional robes, and tourists can get away with just about anything, though most make an effort to be somewhat culturally sensitive (however there are a loutish few who walk around Stone Town dressed like it’s a beach resort).
Personally, I usually make sure to cover my shoulders and knees, though I could probably cover less and still feel comfortable. I also sometimes wear a scarf around my neck or shoulders when I wear a shirt that's more low-cut (I found before I left that it's actually quite difficult to find women's shirts in Canada which are both not low-cut and which cover a good part of the shoulders and upper arm). As it is, I never feel uncomfortable in town with my head uncovered, and when I go to the rural areas on project visits with work, I seem to be considered appropriately dressed with a long skirt and my elbows covered.
This may change in the following weeks, since Ramadan starts today. Apparently everyone dresses more modestly during the Holy Month (though I haven't noticed this yet). Tourists have already started thinning out as well (since the European vacation season is over), so I will start to stand out more in Stone Town. Rebecca and I will have to decide whether or not to change our clothing patterns during our walk to and from work (and our sprint to and from home to eat at lunch time!).
Walking to work this morning, all of the usual food stands were gone, and all of the stores were closed. A square that's usually buzzing with men having coffee in the morning was almost deserted. And Christina and I spent an hour driving all around town this morning trying to find open stores to buy refreshments for a meeting at work. I’m excited about Ramadan, it's going to be very interesting, and I will probably be blogging a lot over the next four weeks...
6 comments:
interesting breakdown of degrees of 'modesty' and of men's modesty too. As you know, I'm all in favour of any kind of restrictive/encumbering clothing, AS LONG AS it applies EQUALLY to women and men....as it rarely ever seems to do. Won't gt into polemic about female sexuality/chatteldom/subservience etc. Rather out of place anyway as this is 'western discourse'. We are in the middle of 'reasonable accommodation' hearings in Que and you wouldn't believe the stupid and racist comments..about moslems, jews, les anglais, you name it. V depressing. Am a big proponent of live and let live...but equality of men and women (or working towards same) is a BIG precondition for me. As you know ! :-) in fact, you could hardly expect to post something on the hijab and not have your mom, product of 70s feminism, weigh in !
send more photos !
xoxoxo
Mom:
I would have been disappointed if you hadn't weighed in :)
I agree with you on the clothing front. If there is a degree of equality (or at the very least an attempt to reach equality), and if it's fully a personal choice (not imposed by law, or by social pressure, or by one's family), I don't care what anyone wants to wear. It does bother me that there is a male equivalent to the modest clothing women wear, but that it's very much optional for men, and doesn't appear to be so for women.
re: the "reasonable accommodation" debate in Quebec, I'm so happy to be half a world away from all that... hopefully it will have quieted down somewhat by the time I get home in March!
I always wonder about the history of these trends. (My perspective is that the culture we see is probably no more than five years old, though it is greatly influenced by earlier culture. I choose not to research extensively, since I am at work.)
Maybe women have complex dressing restrictions and men do not because women go into public less often? Maybe fifty years ago men had all sorts of crazy restrictions as well, but the need to socialize more made society as a whole a lot more lenient. If that is the case, we can always hope the same acceptance happens towards women soon.
The earlier, If not the earliest group of foreigners to East African coast were Arabs, In fact Zanzibar used to be ruled by local Arab dynasty till the 20th century, In that sense there is both cultural and religious influence, The distinctive Native/Arab culture is part of Zanzibar's beauty, Hijab has never been a focus or viewed as being oppressive or sign of inequality, well at least not in 60's or early 70's when I used to live in Tanzania, It was nomenclature, It becomes problematic when certain form of modesty is mandated as part of strict interpretation or used to marginalize women and choice of interpretation is taken away.
Well when it comes to religious persecution or bias/practice the trend in the west is not comforting either.when US comes out with a report on religious persecution of minorities and intolerance in certain countries, Perhaps it should take a look at the trend in its own backyard, what the world needs is inspired leadership both from east and the west.
http://everything-and-nothing-at-all.
blogspot.com/2007/09/this-
explains-lot.html
Peace and Love.
Interesting comment. I agree that hijab is problematic only when it is imposed, i.e. it is no longer a choice. But I think there are ways of imposing it besides law, for example social pressure (where it becomes more groupthink than individual choice), and familial pressure (where choice is clearly taken away).
I also wholeheartedly agree with your comment about religion in the West. I read the blog post you linked to, it's a case in point. The situation in my home province, Quebec, with regards to the "reasonable accommodation" debate is also quite depressing.
Hi caitlin, I know what you mean "group think" but as long as there is individual expression, Than we are OK to certain degree, Unlike women in Iran or Saudi Arabia or where Theocracy triumphs over individual expression, Canadians are fortunate in that Trudeau as Fedral Minister of Justice being familiar with the role of Religion and Politics in Quebec, recognized a serious possibility of separation and political encroachment to Federalism, brought about changes as Prime Minister, introducing the concepts of Multiculturalism and Pluralism though still a work in progress has made Canada a strong and Proud nation especially the Canadian Charter rights, and justifiably so, There will all ways be demands on Govt and institution by special interest, However If accomodations are made based on genuine concerns, I don't mind it as long as we keep in mind, It is a two way street and "Reasonable accommodation" is in the interest of all, and is "justified" as long as it is not appeasement for political expediency, or political correctness, buying votes so to speak. The only strength I see in a civil society is healthy respect for diversity and upholding the Secular.When people say Muslim women are required to cover their face, It just isn't so, it is not in the holy book, modesty is not exposing cleavage or over exposure of skin and in larger context is about morality and not a dress code.
Life would be so simple if everyone loved Hockey...Go Canucks!!!
Post a Comment